Dinosaurs could have survived the asteroid if it landed just about anywhere else, study finds

‘The site of asteroid impact, therefore, changed the history of life on Earth’

Andrew Griffin
Friday 10 November 2017 18:12 GMT
Comments
An artists impression of the Chicxulub asteroid which is believed to have wiped out the dinosaurs
An artists impression of the Chicxulub asteroid which is believed to have wiped out the dinosaurs (Rex)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The entire history of the world could have been entirely different if the asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs landed just about anywhere else.

That’s according to a new study that claims there was only a 13 per cent chance that the rock, known as the Chicxulub Impactor, cause the catastrophe that it did. To cause such destruction, it needed to land in just the right place – and it did, exploding and destroying most of life on Earth.

When the asteroid landed on our planet, the impact heated up the organic in matter in rocks and flung it up into the atmosphere, where it formed soot. That soot caused global changes to the climate that turned the Earth into a hellscape and brought about the mass extinction of dinosaurs and other animals.

But that only happened because the rock landed in the right, or wrong, location, dropping onto areas rich in hydrocarbon. Those areas only covered 13 per cent of the Earth’s surface, meaning that if it had dropped on most other places in the planet the dinosaurs would have been much safer.

To come to their findings, the researchers from Tohoku University used a model to calculate how much soot there was in the atmosphere and understand the climate changes that it kicked off. That helped them understand how some animals went extinct and others survived.

They found that if the rock had landed in an area less rich in hydrocarbons, there would have much fewer extinctions. And so the dinosaurs would have carried on living, long before the era in which they went extinct.

“The amount of hydrocarbon and sulfur in rocks varies widely, depending on location, which suggests that cooling and extinction levels were dependent on impact site,” the researchers write in the new paper published in Nature. ”Here we show that the probability of significant global cooling, mass extinction, and the subsequent appearance of mammals was quite low after an asteroid impact on the Earth’s surface.

“This significant event could have occurred if the asteroid hit the hydrocarbon-rich areas occupying approximately 13% of the Earth’s surface.

“The site of asteroid impact, therefore, changed the history of life on Earth.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in