Cloning scientists fall out over 'payments' for human egg donors
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Two of the most prominent figures in the pioneering field of stem-cell research have rocked their community of scientists by falling out over suggestions that payments were made for human eggs and that junior female scientists may have felt pressured to become egg donors.
Professor Gerald Schatten of Pittsburgh University School of Medicine, Pennsylvania, said he would no longer work with Professor Woo-Suk Hwang of Seoul National University in South Korea who led the team that cloned the first human embryo.
Professor Schatten accused Professor Hwang of misleading him about the source of the human eggs used in pioneering experiments that led to the formation of the first human stem cells from embryos cloned in South Korea.
Professor Hwang has denied allegations that the eggs used in his experiments were paid for or that some of the donors involved were junior members of his team.
The acrimony is all the more surprising because the men had been almost sycophantically effusive about each other's contribution to their joint effort until Professor Schatten issued a statement through his university.
"Information came to my attention suggesting that misrepresentations might have occurred relating to those oocyte [egg] donations. I have accordingly suspended my collaboration with Professor Hwang," said Professor Schatten, who refused to elaborate further.
The two scientists began collaborating in 1984, after Professor Hwang had published his pioneering research in the journal Science, which unveiled the first cloned human embryo.
Professor Hwang has always maintained that the eggs used in the 2004 cloning research were obtained ethically from 16 volunteers who had not been paid for the 242 eggs they had donated. He has also strenuously denied allegations that first surfaced in the journal Nature last year that some of the eggs used in this study came from junior members of his own team.
On Tuesday, however, the Korean television station MBC claimed to have obtained documents allegedly showing that hundreds of human eggs may have been purchased for use in the cloning research.
The station also interviewed a woman who said she was one of Hwang's assistants, although she said she would not comment in detail about what happened until Professor Hwang makes an official statement after an internal investigation.
Professor Hwang told the television station that junior scientists in his team had consulted him about donating their eggs but that he had persuaded them not to. However, he admitted that he had failed to check whether they had in fact gone ahead with donating their own eggs.
The dispute between the two scientists appears to centre on statements by Roh Sung-il, chairman of the board at Mizmedi Hospital in Seoul, who said that he paid the equivalent of about £1,000 each to about 20 women who had donated eggs for use in the research.
Mr Sung-il said that he paid for the eggs because there were not enough voluntary donors, although he also added that Professor Hwang was unaware of the transactions.
Professor Hwang has refused to comment on the allegations but has told Science that he is investigating the matter further.
Other stem-cell researchers are bracing themselves for a backlash in the belief that opponents to the research will use the dispute as evidence that scientists cannot be trusted.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments