No such thing as a good or bad diet, researchers say
Study suggests everyone reacts to what they eat in their own unique way
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Faced with a choice between a loaf of artisanal, handmade sourdough or mass-produced white bread, few would doubt that the latter was more likely to contribute to obesity.
But a new study suggests there is no such thing as ‘good’ or ‘bad’ bread when it comes to losing weight.
Instead the effect of diet on people’s waistlines is much more dependant on an individual’s unique response to different kinds of food, researchers believe.
Dr Evan Elinav, of the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel, told the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Boston: “There is this notion that some bread is better than others.
“Industrial bread is seen as bad and home-made sourdough is seen as good.
“We found that just like any other food, our responses to bread are completely personal.
“This personalised effect is there for every single food. There is not one single good or bad or super food.”
The researchers tested the two different types of bread on a total of 40 people for a study which has not yet been published in an academic journal.
Their blood sugar was monitored every five minutes to find out how their bodies reacted for several weeks.
Individuals in both groups saw their blood sugar spike after eating one loaf or the other, but the overall effect of the two types on their weight was much the same.
This, Dr Elinav said, supported the idea that “the biggest determinant of our unique response to foods is the gut microbiome”.
By designing a tailor-made diet for each person — based on the bacteria in their gut — they had been able to “normalise their blood sugar levels”, he added.
One reasons for ‘yo-yo obesity’ — in which people lose weight then put it back on again — was their gut microbes, Dr Elinav suggested.
This might make them prone to eating in a way that saw them gain weight once a major effort to lose it stopped.
Changing the bacteria in the gut could help people interrupt this cycle of weight gain and loss.
The researchers had demonstrated the effect in mice by transplanting faecal matter from a mouse that was not prone to obesity to one that was and Dr Elinav said they were “hopeful the concept would be true in humans”.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments