Support truly
independent journalism
Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.
Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.
Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.
Louise Thomas
Editor
It took Judge Eric Leach 53 minutes to read out his ruling that, for Oscar Pistorius, changed everything.
South Africa’s Supreme Court had not been asked to decide if he knew it was Reeva Steenkamp behind the door when he fired the fatal shots.
Only that, given he knew someone was behind the door, and he fired four bullets into a tiny room, should he have foreseen that his actions would have killed whoever was in there?
They decided unanimously. Yes, he did. And that is murder.
“The identity of his victim is irrelevant to his guilt,” Judge Leach said.
He praised Judge Masipa’s handling of the original case, acknowledging the difficulties posed by the “glare of international attention.” But his judgement, unfortunately, excoriated her assessment of the case, and her application of the complex law of “dolus eventualis.”
What happens next?
Oscar Pistorius has been convicted of murder. It will now fall to Judge Masipa, the judge in the original trial, to apply a sentence.
When will that happen?
The Supreme Court did not say. But it will happen as soon as a gap in her schedule can be found. The South African authorities are very keen that this protracted trial not been drawn out any longer than is necessary.
Could he go back to prison?
He will almost certainly return to prison. The minimum indicated sentence for South Africa’s equivalent of second degree murder is 15 years. But Judge Masipa is allowed to consider “compelling factors.” Pistorius’s disability could yet be one such factor.
In short, it was her assessment that Oscar Pistorius did not foresee the likely consequences of his actions, though he should have done.
In the view of the Supreme Court, Pistorius, “Gambled with the life of the person behind the bathroom door and that he must have foreseen death.”
It will now fall to Judge Masipa to apply a new sentence. Guidelines indicate a minimum of 15 years imprisonment, minus time already served. But less can be applied if there are compelling factors.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments