Lance Armstrong: US government say disgraced former cyclist continues to hide the truth
Armstrong is being sued for nearly $100 million
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Lance Armstrong has been accused of "continuing to hide essential facts" by the US government as part of a $100 million lawsuit.
The government is suing the former cyclist for alleged fraud. This comes after the United States Postal Service (USPS) sponsored him during the Tour de France. Armstrong was disgraced when it emerged he had been using banned drugs and doping in 2013 in order to enhance his performance.
Armstrong - who is worth $125 million - was stripped of all seven Tour de France medals after admitting to the banned practice.
The USPS paid over $30 million to sponsor Armstrong's cycling team.
Armstrong's character is being called into question by the US government as it tries to get a testimony from his long-term girlfriend Anna Hansen to find out more about Armstrong's behaviour.
The government argues that Armstrong is an "unreliable source of information".
It says that Hansen taking the blame for Armstong's car crash in Aspen earlier this year "undermines any suggestion that Armstrong changed his ways after he confessed to Oprah Winfrey".
However, Armstrong's attorney has said argued that Hansen doesn't know anything about the case and that the government was attempting a "character assassination on unrelated issues through harassment of a domestic partner".
Talking to USA Today, Armstrong's lawyer added: "We find this tactic utterly distasteful and unworthy of the United States government."
However, the US government says the Armstrong has not been candid in his discussion of his doping and drug use.
"Armstrong's admissions have been far from extensive," the government wrote in court papers.
"On the contrary, Armstrong has carefully selected both the media outlets that would receive his 'admissions' and the scope of these admissions. Armstrong's active management of his confessional process has allowed him to continue to hide essential facts about the extent of his doping, who helped him to dope, where the drugs came from, and how he managed to cover up his activities for so long.
"Armstrong has publicly denied doping during his comeback years (2009-10) while at the same time refusing to testify under oath about this issue in legal proceedings brought against him."
Lance Armstrong’s legal team have argued that his Tour de France victories were worth far more to the US Postal Service than they were to him.
His team argue that the global exposure Armstrong gave the sponsor was worth more than the money they gave him, and that the sponsorship paid for itself "many times over".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments