Keith Vaz broke no laws and should not resign over 'sensationalist tabloid style sting of the 1980s', argues Peter Tatchell
'As far as I can see he has not broken any laws, or caused anyone any harm,' says the human rights campaigner
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Peter Tatchell has said the Labour MP Keith Vaz has “not broken any laws” and should not resign from his position as chairman of the Commons Home Affairs Committee.
Mr Vaz, the MP for Leicester East, is facing mounting pressure to resign following allegations he paid for the services of two male escorts at his London flat.
The Sunday Mirror reported the married father-of-two met two Eastern European escorts at his property in north London and boasted about having unprotected sex. The 59-year-old allegedly offered to cover the cost of cocaine if it were brought to the flat but refused to have any himself during the encounter.
According to the paper, Mr Vaz asked one of the men in a text message sent before the meeting to bring poppers, the sex-enhancing legal high drug used by gay men, to the meeting.
Tatchell, a human rights and LGBT campaigner, said he could not see any public interest in infringing upon Mr Vaz' privacy and publishing the story because there was no allegation of hypocrisy.
“As far as I can see he has not broken any laws, or caused anyone any harm and there’s no allegation of hypocrisy, buying sex in this country is lawful,” Tatchell told Radio 4’s Today Programme on Monday.
“Keith Vaz has a strong record of supporting gay rights. He has never gone tub-thumping in terms of supporting family values so what is the public interest in publishing this story”.
“Whatever you think about Keith Vaz behaviour and some people might take the view that it was irresponsible and wrong, I don’t think it’s a resigning matter. I don’t think there is a serious conflict of interest there”.
Tatchell argued Mr Vaz had always supported the decriminalisation of sex work and the efforts of gay rights and had therefore displayed no “double standards” in his actions.
He also suggested the politician may have been entrapped by the paper and argued it appeared to be a “classic tabloid sting”.
“It’s a throwback to the sensationalist tabloid style of the 1980s. It’s not something you’d expect to see in 2016”.
In a statement released after the allegations emerged, Mr Vaz claimed he was the victim of a “deeply disturbing” newspaper sting operation and would be referring the allegations to his solicitor. He issued an apology for his actions and indicated he would inform the Commons Home Affairs Committee whether he plans to resign on Tuesday.
Although a number of reports suggest Mr Vaz is expected to stand down as a committee chair they have yet to be confirmed.
The Home Affairs Select Committee is currently overseeing an inquiry into prostitution laws. An interim report published in July recommended significant changes to existing laws so that soliciting and brothel-keeping are decriminalised.
A spokesperson for The Sunday Mirror told The Independent they "stood by the story".
Mr Vaz' statement in full:
"It is deeply troubling that a national newspaper should have paid individuals who have acted in this way.
"I have referred these allegations to my solicitor Mark Stephens of Howard Kennedy who will consider them carefully and advise me accordingly.
"At this time I do not want there to be any distraction from the important work the Home Affairs Select Committee undertakes so well.
"Select committees do vital work in holding the government and others to account. We are due to publish two reports, one into anti-Semitism and the other into FGM in the next few days, in addition we have a number of key witnesses.
"I will of course inform committee members first of my plans when we meet on Tuesday.
"My decision has been based entirely on what is in the best interests of the committee which I have had the privilege of chairing for the last nine years."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments