Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Diary: 14,000 bogus reasons to stay in Union

Andy McSmith
Tuesday 05 March 2013 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Much as it would pain many of us living south of Gretna Green to see Scotland leave the UK, it really does not help the case for the union if the Government tries to undermine the SNP by talking bollocks.

That is what they did when Michael Moore, the Scottish Secretary, put out a statement last month claiming that an independent Scotland would have to renegotiate 14,000 treaties to which the UK is a party.

It is true that the Scots would have to do some serious negotiating. Recently, the Latvian Foreign Minister, Edgars Rinkevics, became the latest European leader to warn that an independent Scotland would have to apply for EU membership as a "new country". His views matter because it will be Latvia's turn to hold the EU presidency during the Scottish referendum.

But 14,000 treaties? That has prompted an avalanche of written questions to the Foreign Office from SNP politicians, inquiring about the status of some of the treaties on that long list. Has the FCO checked that the UK is discharging its obligations under the Declaration between Great Britain and Prussia relative to Commerce and Navigation between the Ionian Islands and the States of the Zollverein, for example? And have there been any recent breaches of the agreement between Great Britain and His Majesty King Leopold II, sovereign of the Independent State of the Congo, relating to their agreed spheres of interest in East and central Africa?

David Lidington, the Foreign Office minister, has been compelled to admit that "some of the 14,000 treaties are no longer in force". But then, on the other hand, thousands still are.

Who tried to love FT's Lucy?

Much interest yesterday in the identity of the journalist who once tried it on with the Financial Times columnist, Lucy Kellaway,.

At a time when we keep reading of "inappropriate" sexual advances, Ms Kellaway has branched out by calling her would-be seducer the "appropriate face of inappropriate conduct" because he asked politely and took no for an answer gracefully.

What we know about him, from the article, is that he was a fairly senior journalist on the Financial Times in 1985 and still has "considerable access" to the mass media, which narrows it down a bit.

Reforming MP should go home

Every time MPs end their day's work and the Commons chamber closes for business, two doorkeepers, one stationed behind the Speaker's chair and the other in the Members' lobby, cry out simultaneously: "Who goes home?"

This custom, inviting them to band together for protection, arises from when there was a real danger of MPs being mugged in the unlit fields between Westminster and the City.

David Winnick, one of Parliament's longest-serving MPs, has written to the Leader of the House, Andrew Lansley, suggesting that it be ended. Lansley fobbed him off by telling him to write to the chairman of the Procedure Committee, Charles Walker.

"I probably will, but I don't have much hope that anything will be done," Winnick tells me. "The chairman of the Procedure Committee is usually a rather conservative figure or if he's a moderniser, like the present chap, he takes the attitude 'why bother about something that is not causing any controversy?'"

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in