Animals 'do not have rights', says Princess Michael
The Princess, who is married to the Queens cousin, says animals don't 'earn' rights as they don't pay taxes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Princess Michael of Kent has reportedly stated animals do not have rights "because they don't pay taxes".
Her alleged comments sparked a backlash from animal rights campaigners who have branded them "ignorant".
The princess, who is married to the Queen's cousin, is said to have made the remarks at Henley Literary Festival during a discussion about her new novel, Agnes Sorel: Mistress Of Beauty.
"I'm a great animal lover and I'm involved in a lot of conservation, but animals don't have rights. They don't have bank accounts. They don't vote," she reportedly said.
"We have obligation. We have obligation to animals, but to say they have rights?
"They don't have rights. You only have rights if you pay your taxes. You earn your rights."
The princess has previously clashed with animal rights campaigners over her love of fur coats.
Elisa Allen, associate director of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (Peta), told The Times: "Peta urges Princess Michael to study the subject, rather than making an off-the-cuff statement that reflects ignorance of the issue of what fundamental rights animals have, which do not include the right to drive a car or build up an overdraft.
"She should also exercise caution in opining at all on such issues, because her daft assessment would mean that children and certain classes of human beings are also not entitled to rights."
Press Association
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments