Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

BBC defends Panorama exposé

Andrew Woodcock,Pa
Sunday 05 December 2010 11:21 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

BBC director general Mark Thompson today defended the Panorama expose of alleged bribery at Fifa which has been accused of damaging England's chances of hosting the World Cup.

The show, broadcast just three days before the announcement on Thursday of the 2018 World Cup venue, made claims about four of the 22-strong executive of world football's governing body.

Fifa president Sepp Blatter is understood to have referred to the "evils of the media" in a speech to the executive immediately before they voted, and there has been widespread speculation that the programme scuppered England's bid.

But Mr Thompson today said the BBC was "right" to screen the show, which he said contained "significant information about matters of very serious public interest and public concern".

He told BBC1's Andrew Marr Show that the information was received by the Panorama team only a few weeks before the programme was broadcast.

"They spent time checking the provenance of this information, putting a number of specific allegations to the people involved, as we must do, and when the programme was ready to transmit, we transmitted it," said Mr Thompson.

"I have to say that I believe that in the end, although I understand that there are often reasons to believe that transmitting a programme might be impolitic or inconvenient, if you believe that you have a matter of real public concern to broadcast, there have got to be overwhelmingly powerful reasons for not broadcasting.

"I believe we were right to broadcast and I believe we have very strong support from the British public in broadcasting."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in