Party leaders unite against Murdoch
Rare show of common resolve as MPs prepare to call for News Corp to drop BSkyB takeover bid
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.All three main political parties will today unite against the man they have spent decades wooing in an unprecedented attack on Rupert Murdoch and his business empire. The party leaders will order their MPs to vote for a motion calling for Mr Murdoch to abandon his takeover bid for BSkyB in the wake of the hacking scandal.
The show of unity came after a dramatic intervention by David Cameron. He made the decision after realising he could lose the vote in the House of Commons in the face of opposition from Labour and the Liberal Democrats. The mood in Downing Street was said to be "grim" yesterday.
The motion – which is now certain to be passed by an overwhelming majority – significantly increases the pressure on News Corp to abandon its bid for BSkyB entirely, amid still growing allegations of widespread corporate misgovernance at its UK subsidiary News International.
BSkyB shares fell a further 3 per cent on the news as the City concluded that the weight of public opinion now makes a deal almost impossible. In a day of developments:
* Two of the most senior policemen in the country accused News International of lying and prevaricating in the original police investigation;
* Scotland Yard admitted it had so far notified only 170 of the 4,000 suspected victims of phone hacking named in Glenn Mulcaire's files;
* A Commons committee called for Rupert and James Murdoch to come in person to Parliament next Tuesday, alongside Rebekah Brooks, to be questioned on the scandal by MPs;
* David Cameron, Ed Miliband and Nick Clegg met in private to discuss the terms of reference of a public inquiry into the scandal.
It is understood that Mr Cameron will today announce the creation of a single judge-led inquiry to deal both with the failure of the police to investigate the hacking allegations fully and the wider issues of press ethics. It will have the power to call witnesses on oath. The Prime Minister is also expected to name the judge who will head the inquiry.
Ministers said tonight's Commons vote would not be legally binding because it was directed at Rupert Murdoch rather than the Government. But privately ministers said the takeover would be "politically dead".
One government insider said the only way News Corp could possibly buy 100 per cent of BSkyB after tonight's vote would be to sell off his three remaining NI papers – The Sun, The Times and The Sunday Times. "That would be a game-changer," he said.
The Tories' decision to back the motion is a coup for Ed Miliband who has been calling for the bid to be abandoned since last week. But the Liberal Democrats claimed they had forced Mr Cameron's hand by making clear they would vote with Labour.
In New York, News Corp's board is coming under pressure to lance the boil in the UK, so the company can concentrate on the parts of the business that have the most growth potential, particularly cable television in the US.
In an attempt to see off concerns from shareholders Mr Murdoch announced plans to divert $5bn from News Corp's profits to shore up its share price. The company said it would spend the money over the next 12 months buying back its own shares, something that reduces the chance of a share price slump. By doing so, Mr Murdoch calculates that he can keep investors sweet while he considers how to prevent the scandal at his UK newspapers from infecting the rest of the $45bn empire.
Mr Murdoch knows that if he fails to act, shareholders could conclude that it is the mogul himself, and family control of the business, that is holding their investment back. Already, he and his fellow directors are the subject of a lawsuit from rebel shareholders saying that they have put the family's interests above those of outside investors.
His gamble appeared to be paying off, as News Corp shares stabilised and several leading shareholders came out in support of the Murdochs. Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal – News Corp's biggest investor after the Murdoch family – gave a series of interviews saying the closure of News of the World was sufficient to draw a line under the scandal, and News Corp itself remained a powerful company. "News is a lot bigger than a newspaper," he said.
But there were signs yesterday that News Corp's problems in the UK could affect other parts of the business. In evidence to MPs, two senior police officers accused the company of deliberately covering up evidence of widespread phone hacking. At the time News International was being run by Les Hinton – a confidant of Mr Murdoch for decades who now runs Dow Jones in the US. He is likely to be compelled to give evidence at the public inquiry about whether he authorised the misleading evidence to police officers that was given by the company.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments