British Library newspaper archive plan riles James Murdoch
![James Murdoch](https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2009/08/20/13/235139.jpg)
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
![Head shot of Andrew Feinberg](https://static.independent.co.uk/static-assets/support-us/andrew-feinberg.png)
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
The heir to Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation empire attacked the British Library yesterday for "harming the market" in print journalism by allowing online access to its vast newspaper archive. James Murdoch, head of News Corp in Europe and Asia, spoke out days ahead of his company's big gamble in introducing charges for access to the websites of The Times and The Sunday Times.
Mr Murdoch was responding to the library's announcement this week that it would digitise its archive, which aims to be a complete record of British regional and national newspapers. "This is not simply being done for posterity, nor to make free access for library users easier, but also for commercial gain via a paid-for website," he said. "The move is strongly opposed by major publishers."
News Corp's revelation of the new Sunday Times website and the redesigned Times site is "imminent", Mr Murdoch said. After a trial period, charges of £1 a day or £2 a week will be demanded for access to the content. The archive of The Times, is seen as a major marketing tool in attracting subscribers. Many media experts have expressed doubts that the plans will succeed amid an internet culture that has widely come to regard news as a free commodity.
Mr Murdoch's comments showed News Corp's concerns that internet users would find ways round the company's paywalls. He said the British Library derived financial benefit from disseminating newspaper content as widely as possible in order to "secure more public funding".
He claimed that the library and other unnamed public institutions were undermining commercial businesses. "The public sector interest is to distribute content for near zero cost, harming the market in so doing."
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments