Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Times loses less than 90% of readers online

Reuters
Tuesday 02 November 2010 12:46 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Times has lost less than 90 per cent of its online audience since it started charging readers on the website, fewer than it had feared, it said today.

The Times is the first major consumer newspaper to put its online content behind a so-called paywall and the three-month-old exercise is being closely watched by an industry whose circulation and advertising revenues are in decline.

Asked on BBC radio whether the audience drop was greater or less than the 90 per cent it had considered likely, Times editor James Harding replied: "It's less than that."

News International, the British newspaper arm of Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation, said the new Times and Sunday Times sites and Apple iPad app had attracted more than 105,000 paying customers so far.

A further 100,000 readers who subscribe to the print editions and get the digital versions for free have activated their digital accounts.

That compares with 189,000 paying subscribers that the Financial Times reported for the third quarter, a 50 per cent rise since the beginning of 2010 that was partly driven by the launch of the iPad tablet computer.

Like News Corporation's Wall Street Journal, the FT has always charged for its online content, seen as indispensible to the business community.

Subscribers are more valuable to advertisers than readers who access online content for free, because they tend to be more engaged and the publisher knows more about them, meaning a steep decline in audience need not be financially detrimental.

News International's Chief Executive Rebekah Brooks said: "It is early days but renewal rates are encouraging and each of our digital subscribers is more engaged and more valuable to us than very many unique users of the previous model."

Readers are charged £1 for a day or £2 for a week's access to www.thetimes.co.uk and www.thesundaytimes.co.uk. The app for the iPad tablet computer costs 9.99 pounds per month.

The New York Times plans to start charging for some of its online content next year.

Read Media Editor Ian Burrell's verdict on whether the Times paywall has been a success

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in