Men’s Health Magazine angers sports fans with 'sexist talking about sports with women' tweet
The magazine has now apologised over the incident
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The US magazine Men’s Health has issued a full apology over an article and series of tweets that explained to readers how they should talk to women about sport.
The article the tweets linked to, “The secret to talking sports with any woman”, claimed that “the things that interest you are unlikely to interest her, but you can still make a connection".
Men's Health suggested men should help women access the world of sports using back stories and context, which they would like.
The article was accompanied by a number of pictures of men enjoying sports and women doing what was "expected" - looking bored or confused.
The comments sparked an immediate response on Twitter with a series of responses from outraged sports fans, sportswomen and commentators
The Men's Health Twitter feed saw the backlash it created and later retracted the tweets and apologised.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments