Man injected son with Aids blood
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A FATHER accused of injecting HIV-tainted blood into his son to avoid paying child support has been found guilty of first-degree assault and faces possible life imprisonment. The conviction, however, could be elevated to murder if the boy, now aged seven, dies from the virus.
After just three days of testimony in the trial of Brian Stewart, 32, in St Charles, Missouri, the jury delivered its verdict late on Saturday. Sentencing was set for 8 January.
Stewart, who listened impassively to the verdict, is expected to appeal.
Prosecutors told the court that Stewart, who worked in a hospital as a phlebotomist - someone who draws blood - stole the HIV-infected blood from his workplace and then injected it into his son while the boy was in hospital for treatment for asthma.
The jury heard how Stewart committed the crime during 1992, when the boy was 11 months old, because he did not want to pay for child support. Stewart was already separated from the boy's mother, identified only as "Jennifer" to protect the identity of the child.
Jennifer said her son now suffers from full-blown Aids, which was diagnosed four years after the crime. He is kept alive by a combination of potent drugs, has lost most of his hearing, is fed through a tube in his stomach, and has come close to death several times. On the stand last week, she said Stewart had told her that the boy would die. "He said, `You won't need to look me up for child support anyway because your child is not going to live very long'," she testified.
A county sheriff's detective testified during that Stewart, who worked in the St Louis area, had a history of drawing more blood from patients than was necessary, had sometimes "lost" samples and had extensive contact with Aids patients in his work.
Joe Murphy, lawyer for the defence, said the prosecution had built a case out of circumstantial evidence and had failed to offer any proof. "A tragedy is not a crime and theories are not facts," he told reporters. "Mom made an allegation and everyone ran with it."
Mr Murphy had tried to show that the boy could have contracted the virus from other sources, including intravenous drug abusers and convicted child molesters who shared the mother's home from time to time.
But prosecutors said all 23 adults with whom the boy had come into contact tested HIV negative, and there was no evidence that the boy had been sexually abused.
The boy's mother sobbed as the sentence was read out. "My son has been robbed of a normal childhood and given an unjust sentence of his own," she told reporters after the verdict.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments