Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

HPV jab means women may only need three cervical cancer screening tests in their lifetime

Cutting down screening schedule could "free up" NHS resources, say researchers

Alex Matthews-King
Health Correspondent
Friday 10 November 2017 15:33 GMT
Comments
The reality TV star, here posing with friends, inspired a jump in uptake of cervical cancer screenings that has unfortunately trailed off
The reality TV star, here posing with friends, inspired a jump in uptake of cervical cancer screenings that has unfortunately trailed off (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

Women who have been vaccinated against the human papillomavirus (HPV) may safely be able to have just three cervical cancer screenings in their lifetime, a study has suggested.

The change would become possible because the national HPV vaccination programme for girls aged 11 to 13, introduced in 2008, significantly reduces the risk of developing cervical cancer.

A less frequent screening schedule could safely “free up” NHS time and resources which are currently spent screening women aged 25 and over every three to five years until age 64.

The study, published in the International Journal of Cancer, found smear tests at age 30, 40 and 55 were as effective the current 12 tests.

​HPV has been firmly established as the cause of almost all cases of cervical cancer, and the jab protects against the most serious types of the virus.

The study also suggests women who are not vaccinated may only need seven tests after a new, more “efficient” method for screening is introduced in 2019.

The research at Queen Mary University of London was funded by Cancer Research UK and used computer modelling, rather than clinical trials, to predict incidences of cervical cancer and protection from the HPV jab.

As many as eight out of 10 unvaccinated people will be infected with the virus in their lives. Most infections clear up naturally, but some can go on to cause cervical cancer.

The NHS jab protects against the four strains of HPV that cause 70 per cent of cervical cancers and 90 per cent of genital warts cases, so researchers argue the screening frequency can be cut accordingly.

Professor Peter Sasieni, Cancer Research UK's screening expert and lead author of the study, said: “The NHS should benefit from the investment that it’s made by introducing the vaccination programme.

“These women are far less likely to develop cervical cancer so they don’t need such stringent routine checking as those at a higher risk. This decision would free up resources for where they are needed most.”

This comes after The Independent reported GPs had written to NHS England raising concerns about planned changes to the system for inviting women for smear testing, and for sending out results.

National figures released this week show that uptake of cervical cancer screening in England has continued to drop, with levels now at their lowest for 20 years.

Some 1.2 million eligible women did not take up screening last year and cancer charities warned that the boost in uptake seen after reality TV star Jade Goody’s death was now “long gone”.

Overall 72 per cent of women got the jab, down from 72.7 per cent the year before.

Robert Music, chief executive of Jo’s Cervical Cancer Trust, said screening saved thousands of lives every year and a new awareness campaign is needed to boost uptake.

“I am extremely disappointed to see these statistics, however sadly I am not surprised,” he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in