Menopausal hormone therapy linked to greater breast cancer risk for more than a decade after use
New findings could affect up to one million users in UK
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) has been linked to an increased risk of breast cancer which can persist for more than a decade after usage stops.
For every 100 women using oestrogen plus daily progestogen MHT, two extra cases of breast cancer were identified between age 50-69, according to researchers from the University of Oxford.
After stopping use, some excess risk was found to persist for more than 10 years – with the size of the risk linked to the duration of previous use.
The researchers said that if the associations are causal, this means MHT use has already caused around one million breast cancers in western countries – one-twentieth of the total since 1990.
The global analysis used data from more than 100,000 women with breast cancer from 58 epidemiological studies worldwide.
The researchers found that all types of MHT, except topical vaginal oestrogens, were linked to an increased risk of breast cancer.
The risks were greater for users of oestrogen-progestagen hormone therapy than for oestrogen-only hormone therapy.
Women tend to begin MHT at around the time of the menopause, when ovarian function ceases, causing symptoms including hot flushes and discomfort.
There are about 12 million users in western countries – about 6 million in North America and 6 million in Europe, including 1 million in the UK.
Although regulatory bodies in Europe and the USA recommend MHT be used for the shortest time that is needed, some clinical guidelines recommended less restrictive prescribing.
About five years of use is now common.
Coauthor Professor Valerie Beral from the Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, said: “Our new findings indicate that some increased risk persists even after stopping use of menopausal hormone therapy. Previous estimates of risks associated with use of menopausal hormone therapy are approximately doubled by the inclusion of the persistent risk after use of the hormones ceases.”
She added: “Before all we knew was that the risk was increased when they used, the belief was that it went away when they stopped. The main finding is that we now know the long-term effects, that the risk persists for more than a decade after stopping.”
The authors found that 108,647 women developed breast cancer at an average age of 65 – and almost half of these had used MHT.
For women in western countries who have never used MHT, 6.3 women in every 100 on average go on to develop breast cancer between 50 and 69. This was for those who took the treatment for five years, starting at age 50.
The figure increased to around 8.3 women in every 100 for women who used oestrogen plus daily progestagen, and 7.7 women in every 100 for users of oestrogen plus intermittent progestagen.
Researchers also found that the risk was twice as great for women who used MHT for 10 years.
There was little excess risk after using any form of MHT for less than a year.
Richard Peto, professor of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology also of the Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, said the findings suggest MHT is causing an increased risk of breast cancer.
He added: “Don’t want to be alarming, but don’t want to be reassuring either.”
Prof Stephen Evans, Professor of Pharmacoepidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), said: “These results should not be used to cause alarm among women, but there is no doubt that they should follow the advice given by the MHRA in the UK and the FDA in the US that MHT be used for the shortest time that it is needed.
“MHT does offer real benefits for menopausal symptoms, but its use beyond one year seems to confer a steadily increasing risk of breast cancer with increasing years of use. This is a ‘tour de force’ in what has been done and the way it has been done – the findings cannot be dismissed.”
Dr Julie Sharp, head of health and patient information at Cancer Research UK, which funded the study, said: “This extensive international study gives us insight into hormone replacement therapy (HRT) that we didn’t have before. HRT is an effective treatment for menopause symptoms, and we’ve known for some time that it raises the risk of breast cancer. But this study found the risk may persist for longer after stopping HRT than we previously thought, so women should think carefully about taking it.”
The authors of the study published in The Lancet set out a number of limitations, including that there is still not long enough follow-up after cessation of prolonged MHT use by women who had started some years of hormonal treatment at around the time of menopause.
Another limitation is that the collaboration sought information only on breast cancer incidence, not mortality.
Press Association
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments