Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Leading Article: Hargreaves has got it mostly right

Thursday 24 April 2008 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Professor David Hargreaves, the former head of the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, came up with some thought-provoking recommendations for improving education standards last night. Key among them was the idea that the different phases of education – primary and secondary – would cease to exist as more institutions capable of delivering an all-through education from age three to 19 were created (notably among the new academies).

The advantage of this revolutionary idea is that the brightest pupils could be more stretched because they would be allowed to move up the system at a faster rate than less able children of the same age group. Hargreaves is engaged in some blue skies thinking here. Reorganising schools in the way he suggests would create a colossal upheaval and untold expense.

He does have a point, however. One of the biggest worries under the present education system is the effect of transferring youngsters from primary to secondary school at the age of 11. Research suggests that up to one-third slide back in the first year of secondary school. A more palatable solution would be to encourage all primary schools to forge formal links with the secondary school nearest them, so that transfer can be better planned and so that the brightest can be encouraged to switch at an earlier age. This would be less costly than wholesale reform.

Hargreaves, who is a senior researcher with the Specialist Schools and Academies Trust, also says that younger teachers and students should have more autonomy to plan what is taught. His argument here is that they are more likely to be on the same wavelength over the best way to use online resources. Head teachers, most of whom are "upwards of 45 and often 50" – to quote Hargreaves – may have too traditional an approach to learning.

Fast-tracking the most talented to senior curriculum posts could help to offset this. The problem, however, may solve itself in the not too distant future. IT incompetence among teachers may cease to be a problem once those past the age of experimenting with the internet have retired from the classroom.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in