Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Test marking fiasco 'will lead to record number of appeals'

Education Editor,Richard Garner
Saturday 19 July 2008 00:00 BST
Comments
The Children's Secretary, Ed Balls, has announced that the exam board Edexcel is the "preferred bidder" for next year's tests for 11-year-olds
The Children's Secretary, Ed Balls, has announced that the exam board Edexcel is the "preferred bidder" for next year's tests for 11-year-olds (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The crisis over this year's national curriculum tests deepened yesterday with headteachers warning there would be record numbers of appeals over marking this year. Worries about the quality of marking of tests for pupils aged 11 and 14 threaten to cast a shadow over the results – which are due to be announced officially early next month.

The crisis is leading to growing demands for the tests for 14-year-olds to be scrapped altogether because the system is under such a strain. Yesterday, when the first results of the 14-year-olds' tests were given to schools, it emerged that one in four papers still had to be marked.

John Dunford, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders – which represents secondary school headteachers, said the number of appeals was "almost certain to rocket". He added: "The Government and Ofsted [the education standards watchdog] use the SATs [national curriculum test] results to make judgements about whether schools will fail their inspections and heads can lose their jobs as a result. The results need to be accurate and schools will be much angrier at lack of accuracy than delay."

Mick Brookes, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, said his office had been "inundated" by more than 100 emails from members who had not had their results or were worried about the quality of the marking.

He has written to Christine Gilbert, chief schools inspector and chief executive of Ofsted, asking her to tell inspectors not to rely on this year's test results in reaching their judgements on schools. Latest complaints from schools include one from Richard Lane, a headteacher in Tamworth, Staffordshire, who said that markers had incorrectly totalled the marks on two maths papers. According to the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, the national curriculum watchdog, one in five primary schools is still missing results. Earlier in the week, Ken Boston, its chief executive, told MPs marking was "100 per cent complete in all subjects".

The test results for 14-year-olds will be delayed even longer, with some schools not expected to get their marks until September, throwing into confusion plans to allocate pupils into sets for the next school year.

David Laws, the Liberal Democrats' education spokesman, said the tests for 14-year-olds should be scrapped as they were expensive, unnecessary and unreliable. "The marking of this year's national tests has been a disgrace," he said. "Following this marking and administrative shambles, the Government needs not merely to replace its contractor [the US firm ETS Europe] but to scrap the key stage three [14-year-old] tests altogether."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in