'Shocking failings' prompt A-level marks inquiry
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Exams watchdog Ofqual is to mount an investigation into A-level and GCSE marking following claims from independent school heads that up to one in four 16-year-olds receives the wrong marks every year.
The move was announced by Glenys Stacey, chief executive of the regulator, after a report from the Headmasters' and Headmistresses' Conference found there were "shocking failings" in the marking system. Some markers even correct scripts while "in a pub with a pint in their hands", one headteaching leader claimed yesterday.
Ofqual is itself the subject of a legal action brought by an alliance of pupils, headteachers and local authorities over the marking of this year's GCSE English paper. They are seeking a judicial review of the decision to raise grade boundaries between the January and June sittings of the exam.
On the marking investigation, Mrs Stacey told a conference organised by Cambridge Assessment: "We need to respond to what we hear about the quality of marking. We may not want to hear it but we need to look closely at whether our marking schemes are good enough."
Officials at Ofqual will collate evidence about the current marking system with a view to publishing a report in March before the 2013 exam season. Meanwhile, the Education Secretary, Michael Gove, is to meet leaders of both independent and state school heads to discuss their concerns about marking.
Evidence of the slapdash nature of the marking of scripts emeged at yesterday's conference.
Russell Hobby, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, said: "I have heard of people who do it in a pub with a pint in their hands and a football match on in the background. Also, if you're doing it at the end of a 12-hour day in school, I don't think you would have a lot of confidence in the system."
Bernadette Brooks, from DRS Data Service, added that some teachers signed on to mark at 5am and then returned to it at 4.30pm after putting in a full day at school.
In her address, Mrs Stacey revealed that exam boards had had to mark 15.5 million scripts – or around 100 million individual answers – in a six-week period this summer. Mrs Stacey also warned that year-on-year rises in the exam pass rate had been the biggest cause of a lack of public confidence in the system.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments