Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Oxbridge MAs are misleading, says agency

Ben Russell,Education Correspondent
Tuesday 04 July 2000 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Oxbridge master of arts degree is an "anachronism" and should be abolished, the higher education standards watchdog said yesterday.

The Oxbridge master of arts degree is an "anachronism" and should be abolished, the higher education standards watchdog said yesterday.

Oxbridge MAs are traditionally awarded upon request to all former students about four years after graduation. Yet nearly two-thirds of employers surveyed believed a Cambridge MA was awarded for postgraduate academic work, according to research carried out by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.

The ancient Scottish universities award MAs for undergraduate courses, yet 51 per cent of employers thought an Edinburgh MA was a postgraduate degree.

The survey, commissioned as part of a wholesale review of qualifications in higher education, comes after the bitter row over élitism in Britain's leading universities. The survey of 150 major employers found that 81 per cent thought qualifications confusing and 90 per cent wanted them reformed to ensure that equivalent titles were awarded for equivalent work.

John Randall, chief executive of the agency, said yesterday that the centuries-old Oxbridge MA was misleading and anachronistic. He said: "The same title must represent the same level of achievement, no matter which university of college awards it. Qualification titles must mean what they say."

Mr Randall said he hoped the Oxford and Cambridge authorities would reform their MA awards, but acknowledged that the inspectorate had no power to force a change. He said: "There's no course and there's nothing for us to look at. We don't have the ability to look at a programme of academic study if it doesn't exist."

A spokeswoman for Cambridge, which awards MAs six years after a student's first term at the university, said they were simply a university tradition. "Any employer interested in a graduate's postgraduate study at Cambridge would be able to tell what they had done from their curriculum vitae."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in