Exam board OCR faces £175k fine over elementary Romeo and Juliet error in English literature GCSE
Exams watchdog Ofqual has deemed the paper not ‘fit for purpose’ after it confused the Capulets and the Montagues in the Shakespeare play
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An exam board is set to be fined £175,000 after it made a mistake in an English literature GCSE paper taken by thousands of students last summer.
Ofqual is proposing to fine OCR tens of thousands of pounds after a question in a GCSE paper on Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet in May of 2017 mixed up the play’s key family names.
England’s exams regulator has said the paper was not “fit for purpose” after a question wrongly suggested that character Tybalt hated the Capulets, his own family, rather than the Montagues.
The error was in a question that read: “How does Shakespeare present the ways in which Tybalt’s hatred of the Capulets influences the outcome of the play?”
Tybalt is Juliet’s cousin and a Capulet himself, so the question should have referred to his hatred of the Montagues.
The mistake was made during the setting of the paper and was not picked up during any checks.
The watchdog has said the erroneous reference made the question “impossible” to properly answer.
OCR has apologised for the error in the exam, which was taken by more than 14,200 students.
Around 2,700 directly affected candidates were given results last year calculated on their performance answering other GCSE English literature questions.
OCR’s failings are “likely to have a serious adverse impact on public confidence in qualifications” because the error happened during the first year new GCSEs were being taken, Ofqual has said.
It is the first time that the exams regulator has moved towards issuing a fine to an exam board as a result of a question paper error.
Interested parties can appeal against the proposed fine until 16 July but it is understood OCR will not contest the fine.
A spokesperson for OCR said: “We would like to apologise again to students, teachers and parents for the error last year which led to regulatory action.
“We want to reduce the chance of errors like this happening in the future.
“We have revised our system of checks, based on extensive research, with the aim of improving the quality of our question papers.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments