Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Minister admits poor children face 'soft bigotry of low expectations' in schools

Regional differences in pupils' educational chances are 'a scandal' and 'deeply unfair'

Sarah Cassidy
Sunday 22 March 2015 01:00 GMT
Comments
Estimates suggest that the number of children growing up in poor families will rise from 2.6m to 3.5m in 2020 (Getty)
Estimates suggest that the number of children growing up in poor families will rise from 2.6m to 3.5m in 2020 (Getty) (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Children from poor backgrounds are still being written off as low achievers by their teachers because of the “soft bigotry of low expectations”, the Education Secretary Nicky Morgan warned yesterday.

More needed to be done to ensure that no child was held back by their circumstances, Ms Morgan told the annual conference of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL) in London.

Low educational performance in some coastal areas and small towns in England was “a scandal”, she added, citing the bigotry phrase first coined by the former US President George W Bush.

Almost three quarters of teenagers in Trafford, in Greater Manchester, achieved five good GCSE passes including English and maths, but “just a 30-minute drive away” in Knowsley “the number is less than half of that at 35 per cent”, she said.

Nicky Morgan said the Government would not give up control of the curriculum
Nicky Morgan said the Government would not give up control of the curriculum (PA)

Ms Morgan told the conference: “If you’re a child born in Knowsley you are less than half as likely to get the standard of education you need to succeed in life as a child in Trafford, and I think that is deeply unfair.”

Speaking after her address to the conference, Ms Morgan said she still met teachers, head teachers and members of the public who did not expect poorer youngsters to achieve highly. She said: “I still come across people who are ready to write off a child’s chances even before the end of primary school. [They say] children in this area don’t go to university, children in this area are only ever going to be in ‘requires improvement’ schools. I think that’s just deeply unfair. I think that education is a matter of social justice. It’s life-transforming.

“I think it can be a variety of people. The comments sometimes have come from leaders and teachers in particular schools but sometimes it is just a collective acceptance that we are not going to have high aspirations for all pupils.”

Ms Morgan said her next challenge, if the Conservatives won the general election, would be to ensure that excellence was spread across all parts of the country.

Answering questions about the “crisis” in school funding, Ms Morgan argued that the Conservatives’ “flat cash” per pupil pledge would spend £590m more on school budgets over the next Parliament than Labour, which has promised to at least match the current budget in real terms, adjusting for inflation.

But she rejected demands from head teachers for ministers to give up their control of the curriculum, arguing that only democratically elected representatives should decide what children should be taught in schools. Head teachers had called for an independent commission of teachers, parents, employers and politicians which would review the curriculum every five years.

Earlier the ASCL’s general secretary, Brian Lightman, told the conference that the Government’s continuous reforms had made it impossible to measure at the moment how well England’s schools were performing, or for parents and employers to understand what qualifications were worth, and that this might persist for some time.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in