Blunkett: Oxbridge still too exclusive
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.David Blunkett, the former education secretary, will this week reignite the row between the Labour Party and Oxford and Cambridge over whether the universities are doing enough to encourage state school pupils to apply.
In an interview, he will accuse Cambridge of only paying "lip service" to widening access to state pupils. He also accuses Oxford of showing "great resistance" to adapting to the needs of the 21st century.
Mr Blunkett, who as Labour's first education secretary after its victory in 1997 backed efforts by organisations such as Sutton Trust to run summer schools to encourage more applicants, will say the two universities "made the right noises" about widening participation since 2000.
But he says "the structures of Oxford and Cambridge make this difficult because, as we've seen, there's great resistance to bringing Oxford, in particular, into the 21st century and the lip-service paid at Cambridge hasn't yielded as much fruit as anyone would have liked".
In an interview to be published in the Fabian Society magazine on Thursday, Mr Blunkett will say the interview process at the universities entrenches bias towards private school pupils. The interviews could be skewed towards "a certain type of approach" which favoured a learning style taught in private schools.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments