Academies 'deliberately baffle parents to select by stealth'
Parents 'may have to hunt very carefully' to find schools' guidelines
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Academies are selecting by stealth by making their admission rules so complex that parents fail to understand them, the admissions watchdog has declared.
It says that the schools, which are free to draw up their own admissions arrangements independently of local authority rules, can effectively choose the pupils they want rather than obey strict legal rules governing the process.
The Office of the Schools Adjudicator, which investigates parents’ appeals, revealed in its annual report that the number of cases it has looked into during the past year has soared from 189 to 318. The majority of cases involve the government academies, which are responsible for drawing up their own admissions plans.
“Admissions arrangements for too many schools that are their own admission authority are unnecessarily complex,” Elizabeth Passmore, the chief schools adjudicator, said.
“The arrangements appear to be more likely to enable the school to choose which children to admit rather than simply having oversubscription criteria that are reasonable, clear, objective and procedurally fair.”
She added that some schools make details of their procedures so obscure that “finding admissions arrangements remains a challenge even for adjudicators who spend much time looking for them on schools’ websites”.
Ms Passmore also criticised primary schools which give preference for places to children who have been in their nurseries before they start formal schooling.
She said the practice “has been found to be unfair to other children”.
She added: “Schools that wish to give priority to children attending certain nursery provision still do not consider carefully enough the requirements for admissions arrangements to be fair for all children starting compulsory schooling so that they all have a fair chance of securing a place in a reception class, irrespective of decisions made about pre-school provision.”
Margaret Tulloch, of the campaign group Comprehensive Future, said: “We need all parties to give a manifesto promise to set up a review of the whole system of school admissions immediately on taking office.
“Admissions are becoming a free-for-all relying on complaints to the adjudicator to bring about fairness.
“We need a simpler, fairer system on which parents can rely.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments