M&S offers olive branch in row over Rose's elevation
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Marks & Spencer is refusing to compromise after extensive discussions with shareholders over the elevation of its chief executive, Sir Stuart Rose, to the position of executive chairman.
However, a number of concessions are to be offered in an effort to defuse the row. Chief among these would be to make Sir Stuart face re-election to the board each year at the end of the annual meeting. He will also forego a pay award he was due to receive for becoming chairman. Marks & Spencer is also repeating promises to recruit a new senior independent director with enough experience to satisfy City demands for a counterweight to Sir Stuart in the boardroom.
The retailer provoked a storm of protest last month when it announced that Sir Stuart would become executive chairman from 1 June, until he retired in 2011, in a move that flies in the face of best-practice guidelines set out in the City's Combined Code on corporate governance. Investors had been expecting Sir Stuart to leave next year when his current contract expired.
The concessions were detailed in a letter written to the Association of British Insurers and leaked to a website last night. One M&S source argued that the leak helped to justify the company's decision not to consult with the City over Sir Stuart's elevation initially.
The proposed concession mirrors a move made last year by the telecoms company Cable & Wireless, which put its chairman Richard Lapthorne up for re-election on an annual basis.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments