Euronext bid for LSE offers to double Deutsche's cost savings
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Euronext upped the ante in the battle to take over the London Stock Exchange by offering savings more than double those proposed by its rival, Deutsche Börse. However, Euronext refused to get into a bidding war by declining to put a price on the table.
The LSE has twice turned down Deutsche Börse's indicative offer of 530p a share - valuing it at £1.3bn - as too low.
The London exchange remained silent yesterday on Euronext's plans to create Europe's largest stock market, pointing to the lack of a price tag. It said it was ready to talk to both suitors about an offer that fully valued the company and could be implemented. Jean-François Theodore, Euronext's chief executive, said: "Euronext is the natural partner of the LSE and we share the same business model."
Euronext, which runs the Paris, Brussels, Amsterdam and Lisbon exchanges, promised investors annual pre-tax cost and revenue gains of about €203m (£140m), compared with Deutsche Börse's €100m. It also offered to immediately cut user fees by 10 per cent - similar to reductions announced by its German rival, with further fee cuts to come. It would seek a dual primary listing in London and Paris to reassure UK regulators, with the LSE regulated solely by the Financial Services Authority.
Last week the FSA highlighted serious concerns about a foreign takeover of the LSE, saying users' fears would be allayed by the LSE having a parent company in the UK and its primary listing in London.
M. Theodore said Euronext would move to a unitary, single-tier board, with half the non-executive directors drawn from the City. The head of cash trading, who would head the LSE, would be based in London. Asked if he had offered the job to the LSE's chief executive, Clara Furse, M. Theodore said the allocation of jobs had not been discussed.
Euronext estimated it could cut annual costs by €152m in the second year after the merger's completion and add €51m to revenue in the third year. Most of the cost savings would come from moving to a single share trading platform, but also from moving Euronext's UK derivatives exchange, Liffe, to the LSE building at Paternoster Square. One-third of Euronext's staff are already in London, where 41 per cent of its revenue is generated. Euronext estimated it would cost €184m to implement the merger.
Deutsche Börse and Euronext have filed their interest to the UK's Office of Fair Trading, which could refer the proposals to the UK's Competition Commission or European regulators by the end of March. Should they be referred, it could take until September before a decision was made, M. Theodore said, suggesting he would not make a formal bid until getting clearance.
Euronext said it had agreed in principle debt financing with a group of eight banks. Analysts at Bear Stearns estimated it could afford to bid between £6.40 and £6.90 a share, far higher than the current LSE share price, which closed at 572p yesterday.
Richard Dunbar, of Scottish Widows Investment Partnership, which owns 4.7 per cent of the LSE, said Euronext's proposals were "credible", after rejecting Deutsche Börse's bid as undervaluing the LSE last month.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments