Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Building societies attack Treasury's plans for the Rock

Tuesday 18 August 2009 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Building societies will be unfairly disadvantaged by the Government's plan to split Northern Rock in two, the mortgage lending industry has told European industry regulators.

The Treasury's proposal to split the Rock, which was nationalised last year after coming close to collapse, into a "bad bank" containing poorly performing mortgages and a "good bank" with better assets was uncompetitive, the Building Societies Association (BSA) said.

The BSA complained that Northern Rock would be unique in the mortgage market in being able to offer new loans without worrying about the impact of bad debt on previous advances. "[It] is likely to be able to lend freely, without having to absorb losses from non-performing loans, unlike all of its competitors in the UK mortgage market," the BSA said.

The European Commission is examining the Government's plans for Northern Rock. The BSA has asked it to require the bank to pay a yearly fee to the Government for holding its bad assets, and for state guarantees for Northern Rock to be scrapped.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in