Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

A&L takes tough line against merger rumours

Andrew Garfield,Nigel Cope
Tuesday 02 November 1999 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Alliance and Leicester yesterday set its face firmly against a merger in the short term, despite widespread takeover speculation triggered by the shock departure of the bank's chief executive Peter White after a stormy meeting on Friday night.

Alliance and Leicester yesterday set its face firmly against a merger in the short term, despite widespread takeover speculation triggered by the shock departure of the bank's chief executive Peter White after a stormy meeting on Friday night.

As the search began for Mr White's replacement, the bank said it was pressing on with its £300m share buyback programme in what was intended to be a clear signal that the bank is not in takeover talks with any other party. The shares closed 9.5p higher at 897.5p.

Analysts said A&L still has two years left of the protection against hostile takeovers following its flotation three years ago, although City speculation about potential deals is unlikely to abate.

Sources close to the bank insisted that Mr White's departure was over issues of management style rather than strategy. "They are emphatic that there was no deal, so it will be hard for them to turn round and do something in short order," one source said.

One banker added: "I don't think anyone will shed a tear. He ... has got his comeuppance."

Bankers were also dismissive of reports that the final bust-up was triggered by a bid approach from Lloyds TSB, the banking giant, which Mr White backed even though it would have led to the removal of many of the non-executives on the A&L board. However, banking sources said that Mr White had been considering alternatives following the collapse of merger talks with Bank of Ireland in May.

Among the options he is believed to have entertained were a deal with Lloyds or, more plausibly, with Bradford and Bingley, the building society which is planning to float next year. He was also keen on reviving talks with Woolwich, although John Stewart, the chief executive, had opposed a deal while Mr White was at the helm.

Lloyds TSB yesterday refused to comment on suggestions it had made an approach. But one source familiar with the bank's strategy said: "I can't believe that Lloyds would want to be saddled with all the baggage A&L is carrying - a declining share of the mortgage market, the issue of what to do with Post Office Counters and so on."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in