Morrisons and the problem with CEO pay

David Potts has done a brilliant job with the previously struggling retailer, but Morrisons paid £12m to the man who left it in need of the turnaround

James Moore
Tuesday 10 January 2017 11:02 GMT
Comments
David Potts, chief executive of Morrisons
David Potts, chief executive of Morrisons (Reuters)

How much is a chief executive worth to an organisation? Quite a lot, if you consider the case of David Potts, the boss of supermarket chain Morrisons.

Under Mr Potts, the business has just enjoyed its best Christmas in seven years, reporting a 2.9 per cent increase in sales excluding fuel at stores open at least a year.

It has also enjoyed its fifth consecutive quarter of growth, quite an achievement given how competitive the grocery sector is at the moment, and is getting rave reviews in the City.

No chief executive is worth the sort of money they get paid these days. But if you want an example of one that comes close, Mr Potts might be that individual.

Under his leadership, Morrisons pulled out of the convenience sector, which it arrived late to, it struck a deal with Amazon to improve the company’s online penetration, tired old stores have been refreshed and revitalised.

There is also the fact that, as Mr Potts noted: “We stocked more of what our customers wanted to buy.” Retail isn’t a terrible complicated business, but lots of retailers still seem to struggle with that.

Of course, Mr Potts didn't achieve all this on his own. Business is a team sport, and it takes many people working together to drive a turnaround.

Nonetheless, it’s fair to say that there won’t be many - any? - voices raised in protest when the company issues its remuneration report, however much Mr Potts is in line for.

But here’s why I highlighted Mr Potts and CEO pay generally when considering Morrisons. Because, for Mr Potts to succeed so spectacularly with his turnaround plan, and if people are going to credit him for it, and pay him for it, it’s fair to ask another question. How much did Morrisons rate his predecessor, Dalton Philips, as being worth for leaving it in the beaten up state in which Mr Potts found it?

The answer to that is a shade under £12m between 2010 and the beginning of last year, which includes the salary Mr Philips was paid during his 12 months of notice after stepping down.

If you exclude that last year and consider the retailer's performance when Mr Philips was in charge, it under performed the FTSE 100 and it under performed the supermarket sector. It arrived late to the online party, signing a deal with Ocado that has had his successors tearing their hair out. There was also that convenience store business I mentioned, including a deal to buy a load of ex-blockbuster video stores that blew up in the company's face.

Just before Mr Potts started, Morrisons reported its worst results for eight years, racking up an £800m loss.

For Mr Potts to put a turnaround plan into effect, someone has to be held responsible for leaving it in a state to need one. Someone needed to create the conditions for Mr Potts to make his name.

That man is Dalton Philips, who was paid £12m for doing so, including a chunky bonus in his last year as CEO. He was also made a good leaver, allowing him to get his hands on a bunch of share options.

It’s an extreme case. Plenty more CEOs are paid similarly silly sums for simply being very mediocre. But it explains why people get so cross. Celebrate Mr Potts, by all means, but remember how he and Morrisons got there.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in