Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

James Moore: Will Mercer still be crowing in 20 years?

Thursday 02 September 2010 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Outlook Mercer, the pension consultant, was positively crowing yesterday. The pension buyout market has sparked into life over the last 12 months and guess who's done terribly well out of it?

Yesterday Alliance Unichem (part of Alliance Boots) was apparently insuring its defined benefit obligations with something called the Pension Insurance Corporation Limited with the aid of something called a "pension buy-in deal" brokered by Mercer. That looks suspiciously like the incomprehensible pension-speak favoured by actuaries who love to cloak their work in a veil of mystery so nobody really understands what a bad job they've been doing.

What it actually means is that the company has, theoretically, sought protection from the uncertainties of investment markets and the risks of increasing longevity by buying an insurance policy.

According to Mercer, this is the 19th such deal in the previous 12 months. Mercer has played a major role in most of them.

Each of these transactions are variations on a theme. One thing that unites all of these deals is that they are extraordinarily complex and it is very difficult to assess what sort of benefits they actually provide to pension schemes and their sponsoring companies.

But what is clear is that there are an awful lot of City types involved in offering these "insurance" contracts, the sort of people who tend to be on the winning side of whatever deals they are involved in. The crucial question about the deals that Mercer is crowing about is this: will it still be boasting about its involvement in twenty or thirty years' time?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in