Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

David Prosser: The wrong scapegoat for the PPI scandal

Wednesday 11 May 2011 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Outlook The fall-out from the payment protection insurance scandal rumbles on: talk in the City yesterday was all about who should be the fall guy for an affair that looks set to cost the banking sector anywhere between £6bn and £10bn.

Actually, make that fall girl, for it seems the knives are out for Angela Knight, chief executive of the British Bankers' Association, the industry body which until Tuesday was leading the legal battle against the regulatory rulings on PPI compensation.

Let's give the banks their dues. Even by the standards of an industry hardly known for taking responsibility for its actions, forcing Ms Knight out would be an act of extraordinary chutzpah. Are those senior bankers now briefing against her really saying that the head of the industry's trade association, whose members instructed her to take the FSA to court, should carry the can for this scandal, rather than the directors of the banks who encouraged their sales teams to flog duff insurance to as many as 4 million people?

It is not the BBA which has landed the banks with this gargantuan bill for mis-selling. The industry has only its own incompetence to blame. So by all means conduct an inquest into whether the BBA's legal case was a misjudgement – but only on completion of the inquiries into how staff were allowed systematically to rip off millions of customers for so long.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in