Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

David Prosser: Still waiting for the detail on residence rules

David Prosser
Wednesday 07 December 2011 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Outlook How difficult is it to decide whether someone lives in the UK? Very, if you're the Treasury, it would seem. While the Finance Bill, published yesterday, included stacks of new regulation on tax avoidance and the tax status of multi-national companies, it omitted the detail of the proposed new statutory residency tax, much to the disappointment of leading accountants and their clients.

The rules on who can claim they are not resident in the UK for tax purposes are complicated and unclear – all the more so since a string of legal cases pursued by an increasingly aggressive HM Revenue & Customs over the past 18 months. For a small but significant group of individuals, it is not sufficient to prove you have spent very few days in the UK during a tax year – you must also show you have very limited connections to the country.

Accountants had hoped the Finance Bill would finally provide some clarity – a new test to settle matters once and for all. The Treasury, however, now concedes it had underestimated the complexity of the issues. So it won't now introduce the new test until April 2013 at the earliest.

Getting the detail right is important, of course, but ministers have now been consulting on this for eight years. And while we wait, more and more tax revenue is slipping through the net.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in