Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Co-op needs a calm boss taking home a modest wage

 

Jim Armitage
Wednesday 12 March 2014 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Outlook The Co-op board's reaction to Euan Sutherland's resignation should have been simple: "OK. Bye then."

For all his admittedly hard work over the past year, Mr Sutherland has behaved with a petulance and flounce in the past 48 hours that surely made him unsuitable to run this organisation. First, he accepts a £3.6m pay package to run what remains a hugely loss-making organisation. Second, he throws a Facebook fit when outraged board members leak the figure to the media – blaming the leaker for his embarrassment rather than the pay itself. (A Co-op spokeswoman sourly refutes my description of that message as a "flounce", but it certainly looked like one to the outside world.) Third, he resigns while the electronic ink is still not dry on his rant at the "disaffected" board members seeking to undermine him.

Some insiders were telling the BBC yesterday that his resignation was a "back me or sack me" message to the board. It certainly galvanised them into rushing through the sensible boardroom restructuring proposals of Lord Myners.

Judging from the leaks to the Beeb, it looks like some elements in the organisation wanted to go grovelling to Mr Sutherland, begging him to reconsider. This would have been a mistake. He will never recover the backing of the membership for his monster pay packet, and will always be remembered as the man who blamed the whistleblower.

Now that the Co-op has a plan for a workable executive structure, it should not be too difficult to bring in a new chief – with an unflappable temperament and for less money – to lead the movement in its next phase. This should be a conservatively run organisation of level-headed folk with expertise in rescuing badly-run businesses and looking out for the long-term health and prosperity of its members and customers. If it isn't that, it hasn't got a chance.

Richard Pennycook, the stand-in, is well regarded and will be an effective interim (possibly permanent?) boss – but only if he keeps a lid on boardroom pay. The last thing members want to read in a year's time is that he got a giant raise beyond his current £1.8m for stepping into the breach.

As for Mr Sutherland, departing with a likely £1.5m, let him earn his crust behind the closed doors of the private equity world. The Co-op's vulture funds will know some good contacts there.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in