Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

BBC criticised over 'Ghostwatch' drama

Rhys Williams
Wednesday 28 June 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A spoof BBC 1 documentary set in a haunted house which was blamed for the suicide of a teenage boy contained excessively frightening and distressing scenes, the Broadcasting Standards Council ruled yesterday, writes Rhys Williams.

In an adjudication prompted by legal action from the boy's parents, the council criticised the BBC for failing to give adequate warning before Ghostwatch went out in October 1992. Although it was trailed as a drama, the council accused the BBC of deliberately attempting "to cultivate a sense of menace".

Ghostwatch portrayed events in a haunted house with "live" reporting. The scratched faces of children were shown and references made to a mutilated dog. The council received 35 formal complaints and, three months later, one from Percy and April Denham, who believed that their son, Martin, 18, had hanged himself after watching the programme. They argued the BBC had misled viewers into thinking the show was a factual account of the supernatural.

In separate rulings, The Word and Talk Radio came in for criticism over taste and decency.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in