'Unfair and too complex': tax rules attacked in IFS report

 

Ben Chu
Wednesday 14 September 2011 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

The tax system is "inefficient, overly complex and frequently unfair", according to a report by the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank. The report also warned that it is "not clear" whether the 50p tax rate on incomes over £150,000, introduced by the previous Labour government, will raise any revenue at all.

The IFS review of the UK taxation system, led by the Nobel laureate Sir James Mirrlees, proposes that VAT be extended to all spending and that fuel duty be replaced by a tax on road congestion. Other suggestions are for a single rate of corporation tax for firms, regardless of size, and an end to tax breaks for companies that fund their operations through debt. The report also advocates a "lifetime wealth-transfer tax" to replace an inheritance tax that is only levied on assets transferred at, or near, death.

Sir James voices support for Iain Duncan Smith's plans to simplify the benefits system, calling the present arrangements "unnecessarily complex". The report also urges politicians to summon up the political courage to reform council tax by conducting a new survey of home values and establishing new tax brackets based on the results.

"There is no getting away from the political difficulty associated with some of the proposed changes", writes Sir James. "But there is also no getting away from the enduring costs of failure to reform".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in