HMRC tax collection errors soar by 148 per cent
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.HM Revenue & Customs collected £238m too much tax from taxpayers as a result of PAYE errors in the 2009-10 tax year alone, up from £96m the previous year, a freedom of information request has revealed.
This represents a rise of 148 per cent. UHY Hacker Young, which instituted the FoI request, says that the increase in errors is due to glitches in a new HMRC system designed to make PAYE processing faster and more accurate, as well as a fall in the accuracy of manual processing by HMRC staff as they get used to new processes.
Rob Durrant-Walker of UHY Hacker Young said: "Although HMRC's new system should lead to more accurate codes in future, these figures are quite shocking. For the amount of tax collected in error through PAYE to jump 148 per cent is unacceptable."
An HMRC spokesman said: "Over and underpayments have long been a feature of the PAYE system. But our contact centres are able to correct inaccuracies, in part because of the new system."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments