Mark Dampier: Jupiter fund will rise again after a poor year

The Analyst

Saturday 09 October 2010 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I first covered the Jupiter Absolute Return fund when it was launched last December. At the time I was quite glowing, so it is only fair to provide an explanation of its relatively poor performance since. It launched to great fanfare and has attracted in excess of £600m, so for Philip Gibbs it has certainly been a terrible time to have (by his own admission) his worst ever year in fund management. I know he won't mind me saying he is apologetic, and that it affects him personally, as much of his own money is in the fund.

To recap, the fund seeks absolute returns irrespective of market conditions using all the ammunition at the disposal of the fund manager. This includes equities, bonds, currencies, commodities and the ability to short too.

To be fair to Mr Gibbs it has been an extremely difficult year for what he is attempting, and the crux of the problem is that he has been far too cautious. The markets have swung between "risk on" periods, when everything which is relatively risky does well, and "risk off" phases where cash is pretty much the only place to be. It is difficult for any fund manager to cope with this type of market, but thus far a long-only style has paid off, albeit with plenty of volatility along the way. Philip Gibbs hasn't felt sufficient confidence in the market to invest significantly in equities and has therefore missed some of these gains. In addition he has shorted Japanese bonds, believing these to be overvalued, a position that has hurt performance as they have strengthened in the short term.

This level of caution is explained by his longer-term view of the world, and it is fair to say he is bearish, at least in relation to developed nations. Interest rates can only rise in the West given the present rock-bottom levels, and he believes they will have to go up to combat inflation because demand from emerging markets will make commodities more expensive. This will make servicing debt more difficult, and his biggest concern is the huge levels of national debt taken on in the developed world; and not just the well-documented problems of smaller countries such as Ireland and Greece. Mr Gibbs is worried about the UK, Japan and the United States too. Indeed if you add in the problems of unfunded liabilities, I believe the UK is not in a dissimilar position to Ireland, with an enormous debt liability that is surely going to come back to haunt us.

Of course this calls into question the wisdom, and the recent popularity, of investing in sovereign debt. Government bonds are traditionally low-risk securities, but Mr Gibbs believes it is only a matter of time before weaker nations start to default. He therefore has considerable exposure to currencies he feels are strong, including the Swedish krona, Norwegian krone and the Swiss franc. He only has a 10 per cent net exposure to equities, instead preferring high-yield bonds, where he sees the balance of risk and reward being more favourable.

So what should you do if you hold this fund or are thinking of buying it? Whilst he has had a poor 2010, Philip Gibbs remains one of the very best managers in the UK. His record over 15 years is nothing short of superb, and he was one of the few fund managers who made money amidst the turmoil of 2008, so he shouldn't be underestimated. However, the fund is likely to lag if a bull market in risk assets ensues. So if you disagree with his rather bearish view of the world, the course of action is to avoid the fund. Yet who can be sure that he won't be right in the longer term? Even if you don't share his views, I think this fund has a useful place within most portfolios as that bit of insurance against things going wrong. While I too have been disappointed with performance, I added to the fund a few weeks ago. To me it is still a buy. If there is one thing Mr Gibbs hates it is poor performance, so you can be assured it is getting his keenest attention.

Mark Dampier is head of research at Hargreaves Lansdown, the asset manager, financial adviser and stockbroker. For more details about the funds included in this column, visit www.h-l.co.uk/independent

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in