First-borns are the worst drivers, finds study
Let the sibling rivalry recommence
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Younger siblings, take heart: you’re probably a better driver than your parents’ golden child, the first-born.
According to a new study, the eldest child in a family is most likely to speed, get fines for motoring offences and have road traffic collisions.
And at the other end of the scale, youngest children tend to be the safest drivers.
The research, carried out by Privilege Car Insurance, assessed the driving habits of 1,395 motorists.
They found that 89 per cent of older siblings are likely to speed, 47 per cent to annoy other drivers by cutting them off, 46 per cent to hog the middle of the road and 35 per cent to get fined.
17 per cent of first-born children admitted to applying makeup while driving and 30 per cent to using their phone at the wheel.
These were all higher rates than that of younger siblings, meaning first-borns have been in more collisions than middle and youngest children.
In families with multiple children, the youngest turned out to be the best driver - 42 per cent cut up other drivers and 36 per cent hog lanes on the motorway.
Although technically first-born, it turns out only children are even better drivers still, being the least likely to cruise in the middle of the road or outside lane (31 per cent), or cut someone up while driving (36 per cent).
The researchers also found that excuses for bad driving varied depending on birth order. While middle and youngest children are most likely to lay the blame on other drivers annoying them (28 per cent), eldest children say they only have bad road etiquette if there’s a good reason, such as being late (18 per cent).
Charlotte Fielding, head of Privilege DriveXpert, said: “Sibling rivalry is a famous family issue, in particular when arguing over who is the better driver.
“Younger drivers with DriveXpert telematics policies are given a score based on their safe driving ability.
“This technology can not only encourage safe driving and reward those who do so with lower insurance premiums, but can also help siblings decide once and for all who is best behind the wheel.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments