Surgeon is 'fired after mistakenly carrying out a vasectomy'

Incident was one of two 'never events' at Liverpool Hospital

Ian Johnston
Monday 18 August 2014 09:26 BST
Comments
A judge will rule if a man with moderate to severe learning difficulties may be sterilised by means of a vasectomy
A judge will rule if a man with moderate to severe learning difficulties may be sterilised by means of a vasectomy (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A surgeon has been fired after mistakenly carrying out a vasectomy on a patient, according to a report.

The incident was one of two “never events” – mistakes that are not supposed to happen – that occurred at Broadgreen Hospital in Liverpool, according to the city’s Echo newspaper.

Dr Peter Williams, medical director at Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, said: “In the last 12 months, three serious incidents and two never events occurred in our urology department and these were reported to the appropriate bodies.

“We are still in the process of investigating some of these incidents, including looking at how to improve the processes and systems in place and are taking appropriate action. We cannot comment on the outcomes of these investigations at this stage.

“Patient safety is always our priority and we use the lessons learnt from any incident to continually improve our standard of care.”

He added that the hospital’s urology department dealt with more than 4,000 patients a year.

“The vast majority of feedback from these patients is overwhelmingly positive,” he added.

The Echo said it understood that an operation to reverse the vasectomy had not worked and he would not now be able to have children naturally.

Ian Cohen, a clinical negligence lawyer, said the man could be paid more than £100,000 in compensation, depending on his age and other factors.

“If a 25-year-old who wants a family is told he won’t be able to father children it will be devastating,” he said.

“In a case like this where the hospital has said it’s made a mistake the NHS Litigation Authority (LA) should encourage the hospital to hold its hands up.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in