Royal Bournemouth Hospital threatens to evict elderly patients

Hospital claims many patients are well enough to leave

Ian Johnston
Thursday 20 November 2014 20:15 GMT
Comments
The hospital claims many patients are well enough to leave
The hospital claims many patients are well enough to leave (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A hospital is threatening to take legal action to evict mainly elderly patients whose relatives refuse to take them home when they are well enough to leave. An official at Royal Bournemouth Hospital said one family had asked staff to “keep hold” of a relative so they could go on holiday to Turkey for two weeks.

However a recent report by Healthwatch Dorset included comments from patients treated by the same hospital trust who claimed they felt under pressure to leave before they were ready.

Katie Whiteside, clinical manager for discharge services at the hospital, told BBC News: “At the moment, we have relatives coming back telling us they don’t like the decor of care homes, or they don’t like the member of staff who met them at the door. Sometimes they are decorating the house or having a ‘granny annexe’ built and they know that, while the patients are here, they are being fed, watered and looked after.”

On Wednesday, there were 70 people on the wards who did not need to be there and about half had somewhere suitable to be, according to the hospital.

Patients who are well enough to leave are to be given a week’s notice. Those who did not go would then potentially face legal action.

“We would be in a position to commence legal proceedings and formally evict a patient if that was necessary. It would be an absolute last resort but it’s something we are in a position to do with the solicitors here at the trust,” Ms Whiteside said.

She said seriously ill patients had sometimes had to wait on trolleys or in corridors and operations had been cancelled because of a lack of beds.

Dr Louise Irvine, of the National Health Action Party, who is standing against Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt at the next general election, said “the hospital resorting to legal action reflects its desperation”.

“Hospitals throughout the country are being very tightly squeezed financially and suffering cuts in beds so there is very little slack in the system. To make matters worse, hospitals are penalised if they keep on patients for any longer than agreed time-frames,” she said, stressing she could not comment on individual cases.

Jeannett Martin, of the Royal College of Nurses, said: “Clearly, if a person is well enough to leave hospital, then they should not stay there for a prolonged period of time. But rather than condemning individuals as ‘bed-blockers’, we need to look at why they are unable to leave hospital.

“Community health services, and district nursing teams in particular have been cut back over recent years and we know that many are under real strain. If families feel that they cannot cope at home, we need to look at why that is and what support should be available for them and their relative that is in need of care.”

And a spokeswoman for the Royal College of Physicians said: “The most important thing is that everyone acts in the best interests of the patient. We think it isn’t in anyone’s best interest to take legal action against families.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in