Row over 'avoidable' deaths in NHS trusts

 

Sarah Morrison
Sunday 17 March 2013 01:00 GMT
Comments
Labour’s Andy Burnham
Labour’s Andy Burnham (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A row between Andy Burnham, the former health secretary, and a government adviser escalated yesterday as the one-time minister was accused of not doing enough in response to warnings about high death rates in hospitals. Professor Brian Jarman claimed that more than 20,000 deaths among NHS patients could have been avoided if intervention had occurred earlier.

The professor, who developed the hospital standardised mortality ratio (HSMR) now used widely to rate NHS outcomes, said he sent Mr Burnham a list of hospital trusts with higher than average death rates in 2010, but no action was taken. Seven acute hospital trusts in his list are now on the Government's review of 14 hospital trusts flagged up for having high mortality rates.

Professor Jarman told The Independent on Sunday: "Andy Burnham had my figures – he didn't send me any evidence of CQC [Care and Quality Commission]... inspections, and I haven't seen the evidence yet."

Mr Burnham yesterday rejected claims that he did not do enough. He said on the Today programme that he acted "firmly" and "immediately" by replying to Professor Jarman, referring the data to the CQC and, later, by commissioning the first inquiry carried out by Robert Francis QC into Mid Staffordshire NHS Trust. He said the HSMR data was "new" and "the Government could not put its full weight behind it". Professor Jarman retaliated by insisting that "we should have been going in [to hospitals] and... looking at them".

Professor Jarman's comments come after the publication of the Francis report into poor care at Mid Staffordshire NHS Trust. Between 400 and 1,200 more patients died than would have been expected from 2005 to 2008. Patients at Stafford hospital were left sitting in their own faeces.

The professor said yesterday: "The very same Mid Staffordshire Hospital methodology that picked up the problem at Mid Staffs was what I sent [Burnham]. There was a whole group of trusts who had high HSMRs for a persistently long time. Some had even higher ratios than Mid Staffs."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in