Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A "profoundly" brain-damaged woman whose relatives say should be allowed to die responds to music and conversation and tries to communicate, according to a nurse in charge of her team of carers.
The woman's relatives want her "artificial nutrition and hydration" withdrawn, but a lawyer appointed by the Court of Protection to represent her interests opposes the application, arguing she is "otherwise clinically stable" and "has signs of awareness".
The case is thought to be the first time a judge has been asked to rule on whether life-supporting treatment should be withdrawn from a person who is not in a persistent vegetative state but is "minimally conscious". The woman cannot be named for legal reasons. The nurse's views were outlined in a written witness statement, heard by the High Court Judge Mr Justice Baker yesterday.
In the statement, the nurse – who also cannot be named – says she fears the woman's relatives do not "fully understand" how "unpleasant" withdrawing treatment might be.
Mr Justice Baker says the case is "unique" and it raises "very important issues of principle". He has heard how the woman suffered "profound brain damage" in early 2003 after being diagnosed with viral encephalitis.
The woman was in a coma for several weeks and had initially been thought to be in a persistent vegetative state. But doctors later concluded that she was in fact minimally conscious.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments