Judge permits doctors to operate on woman who denies she has cancer

 

Cathy Gordon
Sunday 21 October 2012 01:40 BST
Comments
The number of patient deaths are above expected levels at the 12 trusts, the Dr Foster Hospital Guide found.
The number of patient deaths are above expected levels at the 12 trusts, the Dr Foster Hospital Guide found. (REX FEATURES)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Doctors have been given permission to perform potentially life-saving cancer surgery on a woman who has a "delusional belief" she does not have the disease.

A judge at the Court of Protection in London ruled that the treatment would be lawful and in the best interests of the 61-year-old, who suffers from chronic schizophrenia.

Announcing his decision on the treatment of the patient, who is known only as K for legal reasons, Mr Justice Holman said: "She has cancer of the uterus. She could be cured by a potentially life-saving operation. She lacks the capacity to make an informed decision. She denies she has cancer at all and opposes, and is resistant to, the operation."

The judge added: "The lady's three adult sons all strongly desire that she should have the operation and feel that the potential benefits outweigh the risks."

The judge was ruling on an application brought under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 by an NHS trust in the south of England, which is responsible for the woman's physical health care, for declarations setting out what treatment would be lawful in her case. The judge granted declarations to the trust, which also cannot be named, that the proposed surgery would be lawful.

PA

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in