IVF 'could double cancer risk'

John von Radowitz
Sunday 30 October 2011 23:49 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Fertility treatment can double the long-term risk of invasive and low-grade ovarian cancers, a study has found.

Stimulating the ovaries of women undergoing in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) increased the chances of patients being diagnosed with ovarian cancer 15 years later.

Overall, ovarian cancer rates were doubled by the treatment which forces the ovaries to produce extra eggs.

The main impact was on non-fatal slow-growing tumours. The risk of developing this condition, known as "borderline ovarian cancer", was raised four-fold.

Although not considered dangerous, borderline ovarian cancer still requires extensive surgery.

Scientists analysed data on more than 19,146 subfertile women who had received at least one ovarian stimulation treatment, and 6,006 subfertile women who did not undergo IVF.

Of 61 women who had ovarian malignancies in the IVF treatment group, 31 had borderline ovarian cancer and 30 had invasive ovarian cancer.

Study leader Professor Flora van Leeuwen, from the Netherlands Cancer Institute in Amsterdam, said: "Our data clearly show that ovarian stimulation for IVF is associated with an increased risk of borderline ovarian tumours and this risk remains elevated up to more than 15 years after the first cycle of treatment."

The risk of potentially deadly invasive ovarian cancer was also raised, but not by a level that was statistically significant.

Prof van Leeuwen said this result may be influenced by how many children, if any, a woman receiving IVF treatment had already given birth to.

"More research is needed to examine the risk of invasive ovarian cancer, especially after a longer follow-up in IVF treated women," she added.

She stressed that the individual risk of developing either invasive or borderline ovarian cancer was "very low".

The research is published online today in the journal Human Reproduction.

Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common cancer among UK women, with more than 6,500 cases diagnosed each year.

It has been called the "silent killer" because often the disease is not detected until an advanced and lethal stage.

Each year around 4,400 British women die from ovarian cancer, a large proportion of those who are diagnosed.

Prof van Leeuwen said the study was now being expanded to include a further 8,800 women who have had their ovaries stimulated as part of IVF.

They would include women who have had three or more treatment cycles.

"If we find out that women who receive several IVF cycles or large doses of ovarian stimulating drugs are at a greater risk of ovarian cancer, then these women would need to be informed about these risks when continuing IVF treatment and possibly advised to discontinue treatment after three to six cycles (depending on which number of cycles would be associated with the high risk of ovarian malignancies)," said Prof van Leeuwen.

British expert Professor Peter Braude, from King's College London, said: "This is an important and worthwhile long term study which goes some way to answering the questions that so many IVF patients ask.

"However the results should be kept in proportion as the increase shown was from around five in 1,000 to seven per 1,000 women. This needs to be balanced against the intention of the treatment; for those infertile to conceive a child.

"The study should be continued and extended to those women who do conceive whose risk may be different from those who do not as has been shown in previous studies."

PA

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in