Glaxo to help fund obesity film...

... could it be because they've got a slimming treatment to promote?

Stephen Foley
Friday 08 January 2010 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Left-leaning documentary filmmakers of the Michael Moore and Morgan Spurlock mould might not be the most obvious bedfellows for a multinational drug company. But Britain's largest pharmaceuticals firm, GlaxoSmithKline, plans to pour more than $1m (£628,000) into a film about the dangers of obesity. It dubs the documentary, "An Inconvenient Truth about mindless eating".

The Creative Coalition, a social affairs pressure group founded by Hollywood activists including actors Susan Sarandon and Alec Baldwin, is expected to unveil plans for the movie at the Sundance film festival later this month.

GlaxoSmithKline's motives, inevitably, are not entirely philanthropic. It sells an over-the-counter medication, Alli, which has as its active ingredient orlistat, a drug developed to treat obesity. The company believes that fostering public discussion of obesity will increase sales; it already gets revenues of £16m a month from the drug. Robin Bronk, executive director of the coalition, was untroubled by the tie-up. He called the film "reverse product placement". "It's issue placement," he told PR Week. "We're using filmmaking to promote a film message. Art influences. Look at Al Gore, he couldn't move the needle on global warming until he went Hollywood."

GSK calls its funding a "donation" and said it will have no editorial control over the documentary, a fly-on-the-wall exploration of unhealthy relationships with food.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in