Circumcision does not reduce penis sensitivity, research finds
The study reviewed the sexual satisfaction and pain sensors of 62 circumcised and non-circumcised men
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Circumcision remains one of the most contested medical procedures around the world, with opponents arguing it is a needless operation which amounts to abuse while proponents argue it holds health benefits and is a religious right.
New research has re-ignited the debate after scientists have suggested that circumcision in babies does not reduce penis sensitivity, despite previous claims to the contrary. The new research, reported in The Journal of Urology, studied 62 men between the ages of 18 and 37, of whom 30 were circumcised and 32 were non-circumcised.
Researchers tested penile sensitivity including tactile detection, warmth detection and pain threshold at multiple sites on their penises. They found no difference between the two groups.
The men’s sexual abilities were also tested over the course of four weeks. Their intercourse satisfaction, orgasmic function, sexual desire and overall satisfaction were measured andno difference was found between the two groups.
Lead author Jennifer Bossio from Queen’s University Ontario, said of the findings: “We directly tested whether circumcision is associated with a reduction in penile sensitivity by testing tactile detection, pain, warmth detection, and heat pain thresholds at multiple sites on the penis between groups of healthy (neonatally) circumcised and intact men.
“This study indicates that neonatal circumcision is not associated with changes in penile sensitivity and provides preliminary evidence to suggest that the foreskin is not the most sensitive part of the penis.”
Historically, circumcision was promoted as a way of suppressing masturbation in young boys. It has also been claimed that it reduces penile cancer prevalence rates and chance of penile infections. For many Jewish and Muslim communities, the procedure is a fundamental part of their faith.
The procedure was common in the UK with 1 in 3 men undergoing the procedure prior to the establishment of the NHS in 1948. However, under the NHS, circumcision was deemed not medically necessary and therefore operation costs were not covered for patients. As a result, rates dropped dramatically and it is currently estimated that around 8.5 per cent of British men are circumcised.
Other countries have considerably higher rates, including the US where 75.5 per cent of adult males have been circumcised.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments