Brain injury victims suffer savage cuts in services
Welfare budget reforms and the withdrawal of rehabilitation are 'short-sighted', says charity
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Savage cuts in rehabilitation services are resulting in thousands of brain injury victims being denied help and ultimately costing the taxpayer more money, according to a new study by the brain injury charity, Headway.
More than a million people with a brain injury living in the UK have been forced to compromise their quality of life because a combination of local authority, NHS funding and welfare budget reforms has resulted in rehabilitation and support services being removed.
"Timely access to rehabilitation and continuing health and social care is needed to help people regain a degree of independence, improve their quality of life and reduce their reliance on more expensive long-term care," according to Colin Shieff, a consultant at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery in London, and a Headway trustee.
More than half of the 500 survivors of brain injury in the survey reported that they had lost access to rehabilitation and support services. The charity warned the cuts were not cost effective, as people might be forced to become dependent on more expensive, long-term state support in the future.
Luke Griggs, of Headway, said that people were being "cut out of society due to lack of access to vital support services. Not only is this morally wrong but it also demonstrates a short-sighted approach. Cutting rehabilitation services or reducing access to them is a false economy, as it reduces the chances of people with brain injury regaining their independence."
Mr Griggs added that reduced specialist support put increasing pressure on survivors' families. "Many who feel unable to continue to care for their loved one may feel they have no option other than resorting to residential care, which can cost thousands of pounds a week."
Nicola Scott sustained a traumatic brain injury when she was knocked down by a car in 2008. After four weeks in intensive care and a further three months in a rehabilitation ward, she was discharged.
Her mother, Susan Osborne, had to leave work to become a full-time carer. "We desperately needed help from specialist brain-injury professionals who could not only help Nicola to understand what had happened, but also to begin the process of relearning the basic life skills that most of us take for granted," Ms Osborne said.
Ms Scott received some temporary help from a neuropsychologist after 18 months, but Ms Osborne believes that rehabilitation, such as speech, language and occupational therapy, would have made her daughter more independent than she is today.
"This would have also meant her being less reliant on state support for the rest of her life," she said.
Brain Injury Awareness week begins on Wednesday.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments