Women considered to write better code than men as long as they don't reveal their gender, study suggests
Pull requests created by women on Github were accepted more often than those made by men, the study found
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.American researchers have found that computer code written by women tends to be rated more highly than that written by men.
However, women's work is only more highly-approved if their gender is not mentioned, the study suggested.
The paper, authored by a group of six students from California Polytechnic State University and North Carolina State University, has been published online, but is not yet peer-reviewed.
During their resarch, the team analysed of the behaviour of over a million users of Github, a code-sharing website where users can collaborate, post their work, and have others give them feedback.
The students paid particular attention to 'pull requests' - code submissions contributed to a project by a developer. After receiving a pull request, the owner of the project can choose whether or not to accept it.
The researchers found that pull requests from women to projects they were not involved with were accepted more often than those from men.
However, when the women's gender was identifiable, through information listed on their Github profile or elsewhere, their pull request acceptance rate dropped by 9.3 per cent, taking it below the rate for men.
Looking for possible explanations for the disparity, they examined whether fixes made by women were more needed in certain projects, or whether they only had an advantage in certain programming languages. However, no correlations were found.
The team concluded: "Our results suggest that although women on Github may be more competent overall, bias against them exists nontheless."
If accurate, the study would provide extra ammunition to those who believe the world of tech has a problem with women.
This is evidenced by the gender disparity at leading Silicon Valley companies - only 18 per cent of Google's global technical staff are women. At Facebook, the figure is 16 per cent.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments