Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A judge has finalised his decision to throw out convictions of a Missouri mother for her role in an internet hoax directed at a 13-year-old neighbour girl who committed suicide.
US District Judge George Wu said in his written ruling that the case was never a legal test of crimes involving "cyberbullying."
Prosecutors, who adopted that terminology early on, brought charges against Lori Drew under the Federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Statute which does not involve cyberbullying, the judge said.
Wu acquitted Drew of misdemeanour counts of accessing computers without authorisation last month but stressed the ruling was tentative until he issued it in writing.
Drew's attorney, Dean Steward, believes Wu's ruling in effect strikes down a portion of the computer fraud act.
"He's pretty much found that portions of it are unconstitutional," said Steward, who expects Department of Justice attorneys to go back to Congress for a clarification.
Thom Mrozek, spokesman for the US attorney's office in Los Angeles, said no decision had been made yet about a possible appeal.
Prosecutors say Drew sought to humiliate Megan Meier by helping create a fictitious teen boy on the MySpace social networking site and sending flirtatious messages to the girl in his name.
The fake boy then dumped Megan in a message saying the world would be better without her. Megan hanged herself a short time later, in October 2006, in Missouri.
Drew was not directly charged with causing Megan's death. Instead, prosecutors indicted her under the computer fraud act, which in the past has been used in hacking and trademark theft cases.
Wu's 32-page ruling cited vagueness of the statute and the chance that innocent users of the internet could become subject to criminal charges if Drew's conviction was allowed to stand.
He gave examples of people who could be liable for violating MySpace rules online including "the lonely-heart who submits intentionally inaccurate data about his or her age, height and/or physical appearance," or "the exasperated parent who sends out a group message to neighbourhood friends entreating them to purchase his or her daughter's Girl Scout cookies," a violation of rules against advertising or soliciting sales.
Much attention was paid to Drew's case, primarily because it was billed as the nation's first cyberbullying trial. The trial was held in Los Angeles because the servers of the social networking site are in the area.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments