The Independent's journalism is supported by our readers. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn commission.
IBM dedicates ‘stupefyingly mundane’ OOO email patent to public after ridicule
The company applied for it in 2010, despite the fact the system has existed for decades
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.IBM and the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) are facing criticism after the technology giant was recently granted a patent for the out-of-office email system.
The company applied for the patent in 2010, despite the fact the OOO email system has existed for decades.
The technology has been described as “stupefyingly mundane” by the Electronic Frontier Foundation's (EFF) staff attorney Daniel Nazer, who has given it the Stupid Patent of the Month award for February.
“When the out of office agent is enabled, it automatically responds to e-mail that arrives when the user is out of the office,” reads the patent description.
“While configuring the agent, the user can specify the text of the message, and set rules on who should receive the special alert messages or who should not receive the alert messages.”
It was granted on 17 January, but the EFF argues that it shouldn’t have been, considering the 2014 verdict of the Supreme Court's Alice Corp. vs CLS Bank International case, which ruled that some software concepts are too abstract to even be eligible for a patent.
“[The Patent Office] never considered any of the many, many, existing real-world systems that pre-dated IBM’s application,” wrote the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s Daniel Nazer.
An IBM spokesperson has since told Ars Technica that it will forego its rights to the patent.
“IBM has decided to dedicate the patent to the public,” it said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments